1965 Lotus Elan vs. 2002 Honda Integra
To start off, 2002 Honda Integra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lotus Elan | 2002 Honda Integra | |
Make | Lotus | Honda |
Model | Elan | Integra |
Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4374 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1725 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |