1965 Lotus Elan vs. 2003 Seat Altea
To start off, 2003 Seat Altea is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,593 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Seat Altea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2003 Seat Altea. (100 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2003 Seat Altea.
Because 1965 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Seat Altea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lotus Elan | 2003 Seat Altea | |
Make | Lotus | Seat |
Model | Elan | Altea |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1593 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1770 mm |