1965 Lotus Elan vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 940 kg more than 1965 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lotus Elan | 2008 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Lotus | Nissan |
Model | Elan | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |