1965 Marcos 1800 vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Marcos 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Marcos 1800 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Marcos 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1965 Marcos 1800. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1965 Marcos 1800.
Because 1965 Marcos 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Marcos 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Marcos 1800 (149 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 1965 Marcos 1800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Marcos 1800 | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Marcos | Holden |
| Model | 1800 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1778 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2685 mm |
