1965 Maserati 151 vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Maserati 151. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Maserati 151 would be higher. At 5,046 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Maserati 151 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Maserati 151 (424 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (252 HP @ 7150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Maserati 151 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Clio weights approximately 616 kg more than 1965 Maserati 151.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Maserati 151 | 2004 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Maserati | Renault |
| Model | 151 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 5046 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 424 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 7150 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1476 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2540 mm |
