1965 Maserati 151 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Maserati 151. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Maserati 151 would be higher. At 5,046 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Maserati 151 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Maserati 151 (424 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando. (174 HP @ 6700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Maserati 151 should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 740 kg more than 1965 Maserati 151.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Maserati 151. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando has automatic transmission and 1965 Maserati 151 has manual transmission. 1965 Maserati 151 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Maserati 151 | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Maserati | Chevrolet |
Model | 151 | Orlando |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 5046 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 424 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2760 mm |