1965 Maserati 151 vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Maserati 151. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Maserati 151 would be higher. At 5,046 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Maserati 151 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Maserati 151 (424 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 268 more horse power than 2013 Jeep Compass. (156 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Maserati 151 should accelerate faster than 2013 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Compass weights approximately 534 kg more than 1965 Maserati 151.
Because 1965 Maserati 151 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Maserati 151. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Maserati 151 | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Maserati | Jeep |
| Model | 151 | Compass |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 5046 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 424 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1394 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4448 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1651 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2634 mm |
