1965 Maserati Mistral vs. 1963 Seat 1500
To start off, 1965 Maserati Mistral is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 3,484 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Maserati Mistral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Maserati Mistral (232 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Maserati Mistral weights approximately 80 kg more than 1963 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Maserati Mistral | 1963 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Maserati | Seat |
| Model | Mistral | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3484 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2660 mm |
