1965 Maserati Mistral vs. 1988 Mazda 323

To start off, 1988 Mazda 323 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Maserati Mistral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Maserati Mistral would be higher. At 3,484 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Maserati Mistral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Maserati Mistral (232 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1988 Mazda 323. (66 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 1988 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Maserati Mistral weights approximately 370 kg more than 1988 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Maserati Mistral is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Maserati Mistral. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Maserati Mistral (325 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Mazda 323. (101 Nm). This means 1965 Maserati Mistral will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Mazda 323.

Compare all specifications: