1965 Maserati Mistral vs. 2000 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2000 Ford Windstar is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Maserati Mistral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Maserati Mistral would be higher. At 3,484 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Maserati Mistral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Maserati Mistral (232 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2000 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Windstar.
Because 1965 Maserati Mistral is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Maserati Mistral. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Maserati Mistral | 2000 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Maserati | Ford |
| Model | Mistral | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3484 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3066 mm |
