1965 Maserati Mistral vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Maserati Mistral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Maserati Mistral would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Cooper weights approximately 25 kg more than 1965 Maserati Mistral.
Because 1965 Maserati Mistral is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Maserati Mistral. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Maserati Mistral (325 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (160 Nm). This means 1965 Maserati Mistral will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Maserati Mistral | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Maserati | Mini |
Model | Mistral | Cooper |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 160 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2547 mm |