1965 Maserati Tipo 65 vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Maserati Tipo 65. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 would be higher. At 5,046 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 (424 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 362 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Maserati Tipo 65. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
| Make | Maserati | Subaru |
| Model | Tipo 65 | R2 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 5046 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 424 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 870 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2370 mm |
