1965 Maserati Tipo 65 vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Maserati Tipo 65. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 would be higher. At 5,046 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 (424 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 313 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Clio weights approximately 850 kg more than 1965 Maserati Tipo 65.
Because 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Maserati Tipo 65. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Maserati Tipo 65 | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Maserati | Renault |
Model | Tipo 65 | Clio |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 5046 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 424 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1810 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2580 mm |