1965 Mazda Familia vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (112 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1965 Mazda Familia. (57 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1965 Mazda Familia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 808 kg more than 1965 Mazda Familia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mazda Familia. (81 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mazda Familia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Mazda Familia | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | Familia | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 985 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 792 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2540 mm |
