1965 Mazda Familia vs. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1965 Mazda Familia. (35 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1965 Mazda Familia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 1105 kg more than 1965 Mazda Familia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mazda Familia. (60 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mazda Familia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Mazda Familia | 2009 Chevrolet Captiva | |
| Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
| Model | Familia | Captiva |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 782 cc | 1990 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1845 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |
