1965 Mazda Familia vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1965 Mazda Familia. (57 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1965 Mazda Familia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 688 kg more than 1965 Mazda Familia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mazda Familia. (81 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mazda Familia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Mazda Familia | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | Familia | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 985 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 792 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2600 mm |
