1965 Mazda R 360 vs. 1990 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1990 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Plymouth Sundance (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1965 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 1965 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 791 kg more than 1965 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Mazda R 360 | 1990 Plymouth Sundance | |
| Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
| Model | R 360 | Sundance |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1990 |
| Engine Size | 356 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 16 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 384 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2470 mm |
