1965 Mazda R 360 vs. 2003 Daewoo Magnus
To start off, 2003 Daewoo Magnus is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Daewoo Magnus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Daewoo Magnus (112 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1965 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Magnus should accelerate faster than 1965 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Daewoo Magnus weights approximately 971 kg more than 1965 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Magnus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Daewoo Magnus (181 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Daewoo Magnus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Mazda R 360 | 2003 Daewoo Magnus | |
Make | Mazda | Daewoo |
Model | R 360 | Magnus |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 356 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 384 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |