1965 Mazda R 360 vs. 2008 Peugeot 206
To start off, 2008 Peugeot 206 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Peugeot 206 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Peugeot 206 weights approximately 566 kg more than 1965 Mazda R 360.
Because 1965 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Peugeot 206, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Peugeot 206 (111 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Peugeot 206 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Mazda R 360 | 2008 Peugeot 206 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | R 360 | 206 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 356 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 22 Nm | 111 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 75.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 384 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |