1965 Mazda R 360 vs. 2011 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2011 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Saab 03-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Saab 03-Sep (210 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1965 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1965 Mazda R 360.
Because 1965 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Saab 03-Sep (299 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Mazda R 360 | 2011 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Mazda | Saab |
Model | R 360 | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 356 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 299 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4646 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1438 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2675 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 62 L |