1965 Mazda R 360 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (165 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1965 Mazda R 360. (16 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1965 Mazda R 360.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Mazda R 360. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (230 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Mazda R 360 | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
| Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
| Model | R 360 | Captiva |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Size | 356 cc | 2384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 16 HP | 165 HP |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4673 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1756 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2707 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |
