1965 Mercedes-Benz 600 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mercedes-Benz 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mercedes-Benz 600 would be higher. At 6,330 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Mercedes-Benz 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Mercedes-Benz 600 (247 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Mercedes-Benz 600 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 1965 Mercedes-Benz 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Mercedes-Benz 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Mercedes-Benz 600 (500 Nm) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 1965 Mercedes-Benz 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Mercedes-Benz 600 | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | 600 | FTO |
Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6330 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 500 Nm | 202 Nm |
Top Speed | 205 km/hour | 226 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1300 mm |