1965 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (169 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1965 Mercedes-Benz SL. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1965 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Mercedes-Benz SL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (316 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mercedes-Benz SL. (196 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Mercedes-Benz SL | 2008 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | SL | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2305 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 169 HP |
Torque | 196 Nm | 316 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |