1965 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Mercedes-Benz SL (196 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 1965 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Mercedes-Benz SL | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Smart |
| Model | SL | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 196 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 1867 mm |
