1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1980 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 (79 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 weights approximately 195 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 (142 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
| Model | W 110 | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1895 cc | 1951 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2530 mm |
