1965 MG 1100 vs. 2008 Volvo C30
To start off, 2008 Volvo C30 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,519 cc, 2008 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volvo C30 (208 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1965 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1965 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo C30 weights approximately 522 kg more than 1965 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo C30 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1965 MG 1100 | 2008 Volvo C30 | |
Make | MG | Volvo |
Model | 1100 | C30 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2519 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1347 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2650 mm |