1965 MG 1100 vs. 2012 Mazda 6
To start off, 2012 Mazda 6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG 1100 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 6 (272 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1965 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1965 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 6 weights approximately 796 kg more than 1965 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 6 (364 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1965 MG 1100 | 2012 Mazda 6 | |
Make | MG | Mazda |
Model | 1100 | 6 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 272 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 364 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1621 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2789 mm |