1965 MG MGB vs. 2002 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG MGB would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 MG MGB is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 MG MGB weights approximately 116 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1965 MG MGB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 MG MGB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 1965 MG MGB has manual transmission. 1965 MG MGB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 MG MGB | 2002 Mitsubishi eK | |
Make | MG | Mitsubishi |
Model | MGB | eK |
Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 906 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2350 mm |