1965 MG MGC vs. 1968 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1968 Triumph 1300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 1300. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 1300.
Because 1965 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 MG MGC (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 1300. (99 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1965 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1965 MG MGC | 1968 Triumph 1300 | |
Make | MG | Triumph |
Model | MGC | 1300 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1968 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 99 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2460 mm |