1965 MG MGC vs. 2000 Saturn L
To start off, 2000 Saturn L is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2000 Saturn L. (135 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2000 Saturn L.
Because 1965 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Saturn L, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Saturn L (193 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
1965 MG MGC | 2000 Saturn L | |
Make | MG | Saturn |
Model | MGC | L |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 193 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2710 mm |