1965 MG MGC vs. 2006 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Rexton (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1965 MG MGC. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1965 MG MGC.
Because 2006 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 MG MGC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Rexton (340 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
1965 MG MGC | 2006 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | MG | SsangYong |
Model | MGC | Rexton |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2830 mm |