1965 MG MGC vs. 2010 BMW Z4
To start off, 2010 BMW Z4 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW Z4 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1965 MG MGC. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW Z4 should accelerate faster than 1965 MG MGC.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW Z4 (350 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 BMW Z4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
1965 MG MGC | 2010 BMW Z4 | |
Make | MG | BMW |
Model | MGC | Z4 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4239 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2497 mm |