1965 MG MGC vs. 2010 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2010 Nissan GT-R is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG MGC would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan GT-R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan GT-R (485 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 337 more horse power than 1965 MG MGC. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 1965 MG MGC.
Because 2010 Nissan GT-R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 MG MGC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan GT-R (588 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 414 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan GT-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 MG MGC | 2010 Nissan GT-R | |
| Make | MG | Nissan |
| Model | MGC | GT-R |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 485 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 588 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4651 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1372 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2779 mm |
