1965 Mitsubishi 500 vs. 1993 Rover 200
To start off, 1993 Rover 200 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mitsubishi 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mitsubishi 500 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Rover 200 (94 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1965 Mitsubishi 500. (23 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1965 Mitsubishi 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Rover 200 weights approximately 592 kg more than 1965 Mitsubishi 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Mitsubishi 500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Mitsubishi 500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Rover 200 (124 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mitsubishi 500. (34 Nm). This means 1993 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mitsubishi 500.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Mitsubishi 500 | 1993 Rover 200 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Rover |
Model | 500 | 200 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 593 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 23 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 34 Nm | 124 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 530 kg | 1122 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1410 mm |