1965 Mitsubishi 500 vs. 2008 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2008 Holden Commodore is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mitsubishi 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mitsubishi 500 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 337 more horse power than 1965 Mitsubishi 500. (23 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1965 Mitsubishi 500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mitsubishi 500. (34 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mitsubishi 500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Mitsubishi 500 | 2008 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Holden |
| Model | 500 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 593 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 23 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 34 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
