1965 Mitsubishi 500 vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mitsubishi 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mitsubishi 500 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1965 Mitsubishi 500. (23 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1965 Mitsubishi 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Commander weights approximately 863 kg more than 1965 Mitsubishi 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Commander (320 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 286 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mitsubishi 500. (34 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mitsubishi 500.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Mitsubishi 500 | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Jeep |
Model | 500 | Commander |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 593 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 23 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 34 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 530 kg | 1393 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2070 mm | 2790 mm |