1965 Morgan 4 vs. 2000 Plymouth Neon
To start off, 2000 Plymouth Neon is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,687 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Plymouth Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Plymouth Neon (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1965 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Plymouth Neon should accelerate faster than 1965 Morgan 4.
Because 1965 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Plymouth Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Morgan 4 | 2000 Plymouth Neon | |
Make | Morgan | Plymouth |
Model | 4 | Neon |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1340 cc | 1687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2650 mm |