1965 Morgan 4 vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1965 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1965 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 370 kg more than 1965 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Morgan 4 | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Morgan | Renault |
Model | 4 | Clio |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1340 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2690 mm |