1965 Morgan 4 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Impala (300 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1965 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1965 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 953 kg more than 1965 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Morgan 4 | 2012 Chevrolet Impala | |
| Make | Morgan | Chevrolet |
| Model | 4 | Impala |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1340 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1613 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1852 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1491 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2807 mm |
