1965 Morgan 4 vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 342 more horse power than 1965 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 1965 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 2032 kg more than 1965 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Morgan 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Morgan 4 | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
| Make | Morgan | Cadillac |
| Model | 4 | ESCALADE |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1340 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 397 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 2692 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5639 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2009 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1892 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3302 mm |
