1965 Morgan 4 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 321 more horse power than 1965 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1965 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1901 kg more than 1965 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Morgan 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Morgan 4 | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Morgan | Toyota |
| Model | 4 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1340 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 376 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 2561 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3700 mm |
