1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1951 Singer SM 1500
To start off, 1965 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Singer SM 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Singer SM 1500 would be higher. At 1,495 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Singer SM 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Nissan Bluebird (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1951 Singer SM 1500. (47 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1951 Singer SM 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 60 kg more than 1951 Singer SM 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Singer SM 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Nissan Bluebird | 1951 Singer SM 1500 | |
Make | Nissan | Singer |
Model | Bluebird | SM 1500 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1189 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2320 mm |