1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600
To start off, 1965 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 2,636 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Nissan Bluebird | 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | |
| Make | Nissan | Willys-Overland |
| Model | Bluebird | Aero-Willys 2600 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 2636 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2740 mm |
