1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1997 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1997 Honda CR-V is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Honda CR-V (128 HP) has 75 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Honda CR-V weights approximately 600 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Honda CR-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Nissan Bluebird | 1997 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Nissan | Honda |
| Model | Bluebird | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 128 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2620 mm |
