1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1998 Proton Tiara
To start off, 1998 Proton Tiara is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,189 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Proton Tiara (59 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Proton Tiara should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 114 kg more than 1998 Proton Tiara.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Proton Tiara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Nissan Bluebird | 1998 Proton Tiara | |
| Make | Nissan | Proton |
| Model | Bluebird | Tiara |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 786 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2290 mm |
