1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2000 Proton 300
To start off, 2000 Proton 300 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Proton 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Proton 300 (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Proton 300 should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Proton 300 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Proton 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2000 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Nissan | Proton |
| Model | Bluebird | 300 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2450 mm |
