1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2002 Holden Vectra
To start off, 2002 Holden Vectra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden Vectra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden Vectra (209 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden Vectra should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden Vectra weights approximately 610 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Holden Vectra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2002 Holden Vectra | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Bluebird | Vectra |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 3175 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 209 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2710 mm |
