1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2003 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2003 Honda CR-V is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Honda CR-V (160 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda CR-V weights approximately 618 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2003 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Nissan | Honda |
| Model | Bluebird | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 2360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1518 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2630 mm |
