1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2003 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2003 Suzuki Swift is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,189 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Nissan Bluebird (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Suzuki Swift. (52 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 2003 Suzuki Swift. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 160 kg more than 2003 Suzuki Swift. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Suzuki Swift. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2003 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
Model | Bluebird | Swift |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1189 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2270 mm |