1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2003 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 2003 Westfield ZEI is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,298 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Westfield ZEI is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield ZEI (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield ZEI should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 230 kg more than 2003 Westfield ZEI.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Westfield ZEI. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2003 Westfield ZEI | |
| Make | Nissan | Westfield |
| Model | Bluebird | ZEI |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 1298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 3550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2340 mm |
